New User:

Forgot your password?

Stock Market & Financial Investment News

News Breaks
July 19, 2013
17:54 EDTPBIBPorter Bancorp announces unfavorable jury verdict, plans appeal
On July 16, a jury in Louisville, Kentucky returned a verdict against PBI Bank, the banking subsidiary of Porter Bancorp, awarding the plaintiffs compensatory damages of $1.515M and punitive damages of $5.5M The case arose from a settlement in which PBI Bank agreed to release the plaintiffs and guarantors from obligations of more than $26M related to a real estate project in Louisville. The plaintiffs were granted a right of first refusal to repurchase a tract of land within the project. In exchange, the plaintiffs conveyed the real estate securing the loans to PBI Bank. A third-party made an offer to purchase the tract of land. After plaintiffs declined to exercise their right of first refusal, PBI Bank sold the tract to the third-party. Plaintiffs alleged that the Bank had knowledge of the third-party before the conveyance of the land by the Plaintiffs to the Bank. Plaintiffs asserted claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, tortuous interference with prospective business advantage and conspiracy to commit fraud, negligence, and conspiracy against PBI Bank. After conferring with its legal advisors, PBI Bank believes the findings and damages are excessive and contrary to the law, and that it has meritorious grounds to seek reconsideration of the verdict and to appeal. PBI Bank intends to file motions to reduce or overturn the award and otherwise for reconsideration of the case.
News For PBIB From The Last 14 Days
Sign up for a free trial to see the rest of the stories you've been missing.
November 17, 2014
08:08 EDTPBIBClinton Group says Porter Bancorp 10Q includes inaccurate suggestion
SBAV and its investment adviser Clinton Group released a statement in response to the Third Quarter Form 10-Q filed by Porter Bancorp on November 14, stating in part: "Porter Bancorp's statement inaccurately suggests the court held that Clinton committed errors in conducting due diligence on SBAV's investment in Porter Bancorp. In fact, the court held that only 'if proven' would Clinton's alleged mistakes 'lessen any recovery to which SBAV may be entitled,' and that the court 'cannot agree with [PBIB's reading of the law], which accords neither with the fundamental policy goals at the securities laws' core nor with common sense.' As a result, the Court dismissed Porter Bancorp's claims against Clinton Group in their entirety."

Sign up for a free trial to see the rest of the stories you've been missing.

I agree to the disclaimer & terms of use