New User:

Forgot your password?

Stock Market & Financial Investment News

News Breaks
June 10, 2014
08:32 EDTFNJN, FEYEFinjan Holdings provides update on recent docket order in Fireye litigation
According to Julie Mar-Spinola, VP, Legal Operations, "Although we will not speculate on the outcome of the reexaminations, we are optimistic that the validity of our patents will be reaffirmed and the FireEye District Court action will resume soon thereafter." To date, the U.S. Patent Office has twice denied separate requests by FireEye for reexamination of Finjan's U.S. Patent No. 8,079,086.
News For FNJN;FEYE From The Last 14 Days
Sign up for a free trial to see the rest of the stories you've been missing.
October 23, 2014
11:25 EDTFEYEInternet security names climb after Check Point, Fortinet beat expectations
Subscribe for More Information
October 22, 2014
06:44 EDTFEYEU.S. weighing cybersecurity requirements for bank vendors, NY Times says
Subscribe for More Information
October 21, 2014
08:19 EDTFNJNFinjan Holdings says court coincides with its theories against Blue Coat
Finjan Holdings announced an update in the Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems case that was filed on August 28, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Markman hearing was held on August 22. On October 20 the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman entered her Order construing disputed claim terms in U.S. Patents Nos. 6,154,844; 6,804,780; 6,965,968; 7,058,822; 7,418,731 and 7,647,633. The Markman Order is available on PACER as Docket No. 118. "We believe the Court's Order coincides with Finjan's infringement theories against Blue Coat allowing us to move forward without dropping any of our asserted patents, theories, or any of the accused products, thereby reinforcing our damages case against Blue Coat," commented Julie Mar-Spinola, VP, Legal Operations of Finjan. "Finjan applauds Judge Freeman's issuance of a comprehensive Markman Order, which provides both guidance and clarity on the meaning of certain disputed claim, supporting Finjan's infringement case," said Mar-Spinola. A jury trial in this matter is set for July 20, 2015.
October 16, 2014
10:01 EDTFEYEOn The Fly: Analyst Upgrade Summary
Subscribe for More Information
05:31 EDTFEYEFireEye upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JPMorgan
Subscribe for More Information
October 13, 2014
09:23 EDTFEYEHP could buy lower valuation company, says Bernstein
Subscribe for More Information
October 12, 2014
17:34 EDTFEYEJPMorgan to double spending on cybersecurity over next five years, WSJ says
Subscribe for More Information
October 9, 2014
06:40 EDTFEYESource of JPMorgan cyberattack still unclear, NY Times says
The source of the cyberattack on JPMorgan (JPM) and other U.S. financial institutions this summer is still unclear, according to The New York Times. The hackers may have tried to hit about a dozen financial institutions , and E-Trade(ETFC) and Fidelity Investments may have been victimized in some way, the newspaper stated, citing an unnamed source who was briefed on the matter. At least five other banks, including Citigroup (C), HSBC (HBC) and Regions Financial (RF), discovered that one of the web addresses used by those who hacked JPMorgan tried to penetrate their systems, The Times quoted unnamed sources briefed on the matter as saying. Publicly traded companies in the space include Barracuda Networks (CUDA), Check Point (CHKP), F5 Networks (FFIV), FireEye (FEYE), Fortinet (FTNT), Imperva (IMPV), Palo Alto (PANW), Proofpoint (PFPT), Qualys (QLYS) and Symantec (SYMC). Reference Link

Sign up for a free trial to see the rest of the stories you've been missing.

I agree to the disclaimer & terms of use